Men's Hooded Bathrobe The Find

Liturgy evolving? New 'attack' to the Customs by the Osservatore Romano

Parto da una premessa per nulla estranea all'argomento presentato nel titolo, che sviluppo nell'esposizione successiva.

Premessa

Stiamo assistendo a grandi mutamenti anche nell'architettura sacra, emblema dell'iconoclastia del Sacro della nostra epoca. Il nostro Osservatorio sul Cammino neocatecumenale ci spinge a tornare sulla liturgia e sulla trasformazione delle chiese insieme allo distortion of sacred spaces by means of the "new aesthetic " kikiana. One can easily see from the photos easy to find so many churches founded by the NC, as along the main axis of the nave are arranged in a straight line: the source (a puddle) baptismal , the ' altar, the' ambo and most recently the presidential seat .

This provision is not random or simply aesthetic, but meets a specific criterion symbol of the beginning, which would create a strong sense of user-friendly through the Eucharist Neocatechumenals. According to him, the parish-church (in essence, the NC Community which will surely replace them) is seen as a woman in labor : the altar represents the woman's belly; on the table of the Eucharist, in fact, there is the "Lord's Supper " and does not return to the Father, so bloodless, the offer of the sacrifice of Jesus, died for our salvation, but people eat of His Body and His Blood with reference to the Passover rather than the Last Supper. The ambo is the woman's mouth (ambo it proclaims the word of the Lord), and finally there is the presidential seat representing the woman's head . The baptismal font is the uterus. The priest is merely the chairman of the celebrant, a sort of primus inter pares whose charisma is simply minister . Is lacking the traditional figure of the 'Alter Christus . The priest no longer attend in place of Christ, but symbolizes the Christ, while the common priesthood of the faithful shall, as more and more diluted, the ministerial. If someone could come up with that "woman" represents Maria Mater Ecclesiae , if they immediately remove from the mind, because it represents "the community", a sort of hypostatization newly minted in the Church of Christ.

Customs denied and further attacks

All of these factors, unrelated to an authentic Catholic worship, but the similarities in the trials are favored by the progressive leitmotiv of the Church: " a constant concern of the great Christian tradition faithfully transmit the core of the faith, updating its forms to make them understandable and meaningful celebration in the life of people of all ages . "

I have taken these words from an article in the Osservatore Romano of these days on a recent conference held Rome [ see full text], which is a condensation of thought vaticanosecondista dominant ideology in terms of architecture and liturgy. The content, however, smoky and highly praising innovation always in the spirit-of-council, and it alarmed us not a little disconcerting, given the fact that recently, the Cardinal Canizares said that the reform of the reform "- which seems finally abandoned to make way for the "new liturgical movement" that is "bottom up" [ talked about that here ] - mean the recovery of full adherence and "completion" of the directives of the Council concerning the liturgy, resumed its Osservatore Romano. Here are some excerpts:

The High Middle Ages, teaches us that the evolution of the rite is being inside history

History of Christianity and the liturgy; continuity and change in the liturgy, the early centuries of tradition and innovation are the three themes who have crossed, and summarized the conference "Liturgies and cultures between the age of Gregory the Great and Leo III. ritual aspects, and institutional ecclesiological" which took place on 24 and 25 February at the European University of Rome. We publish the conclusions of the Deputy Director of our newspaper.

[...] But the liturgy is a matter of life or death for the Church, if it fails to bring the faithful and so that they are themselves to accomplish it, has failed in its task and has lost its right to exist. [...]

would be important to a new season with enthusiasm and effort on the part of the liturgists convinced of the goodness of the conciliar reform to better communicate the nature and direction of the reform and expand a conscious and active participation in the Eucharist and the other sacraments. Explain the flexibility already contained in the Roman Missal approved and the importance of a complete reception of Vatican II Dei Verbum and to tune seriously with the liturgy of the Church. In the age of multimedia and digital communications' s aphasia liturgical nonsense and a ballast for the credibility of the Christian.

[...]

The Church still needs many who devote themselves with passion to the liturgy and who know how to put the center of history and meaning of life the search for God, like Don Luigi Della Torre (1930-1996), a great liturgist and pastor of the diocese of the Pope was one of those happy priests of their vocation and therefore more free of spirit that have translated the conciliar liturgical reform in Italy in a new ecclesial life. He may suggest a method and a concrete pastoral path. He was convinced that the proposal in the liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium was the catechism of choice for a good Christian life because the prayer of the Church adapts the minds and hearts of the faithful to the Word of God and urges those who take part in our time with sincerity, the imitation of Christ.

Well, a hint of the background Don Luigi Della Torre, referred to Di Cicco:

"... especially in the period immediately after the year in which it was nascent status, the Neocatechumenal attracted top representatives of the renewal progressive Catholic liturgy and culture. Among these supporters of the first hour there was Don Luigi Della Torre , skilled liturgist, parish priest in Rome's Church of the Nativity as a Gaul, near the Franco Rhone-Communist Catholic thinker. The Church of Nativity, with the next pastor, had revolutionized the architecture of its interior according to the dictates of Kiko. "

Source: http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=765

I will not dwell on reported individual songs, which are answered in the discussions that follow, but I can not remove the word "aphasia", which hit me like a slap (in the transcript above, I marked in bold). If you are forced to establish a 'liturgical aphasia, there is clear evidence that lacks a presence in the liturgy, that of the Living Word, who speaks and creates same time, that our Lord in Body and Blood Soul and Divinity, the true protagonist of the celebration. Let me add a remark:

The article is filled with many beautiful words, some even desirable, but if the Liturgy of the Eucharist flowed from Vatican II (it's really true reading better Sacrosanctum Concilium ?) Is The most obvious result of the 'new Pentecost':

• there almost no doubt, given the results?
• is only required action by the liturgists apologetic or even a recovery of sound doctrine and teachings to the faithful in their expressions of worship?
• if leaps forward minority were still waiting for new expressions through the "new liturgical movement"?
• if salus animarum support and push the Consilium , can only be the result of general de-Christianization of the fact that since 1970 at least 50% of students have left the Church in practice and beliefs?
• is just so irrelevant way of being the official prayer of the Church?
• is just so irrelevant given the ecclesiology, I would say subliminally, the Liturgical Reform?
• Reform? We remind you of something?

Here is the reflection - dates back to 2007, but remains very current - an interlocutor with whom we have entered into genuine dialogue and is now 'out' from the path nc:

"Why in the hearts and minds of people there is this need to "blatant ", ie make a Liturgy attractive? The answer, I believe, is that materialism has so permeated our lives, however, which has lost all sense of sacred mystery. You do not go to a liturgy because it is an event that affects the spiritual planes, and then there Heavenly projects in the Assembly, but what matters is the form, a form that must be nice and can be so only if the ceremony is adapted to our tastes.

Just to stay in theme-blog, is clear that the celebrations in the CN incorporate much of this need that people have to adapt the liturgy to their own tastes by introducing new modes of behavior and signs . I do not want food with this new controversy, but I think that saying "we discover the origins" and as freeze the action of the Lord in the history note at the beginning.

fact or consider that the Lord intervenes in history primarily through the liturgy and that therefore the Holy Spirit to drive changes through the centuries, illuminating the Church (Understood in this case necessarily as Pope, Cardinals and Bishops and to whom we owe obedience). The rest is inventive staff, maybe even good but we are in the discretion of the individual. "

We were always aware, and we have repeatedly argued that its climate has encouraged the proliferation of reconciling path n, while the ' current hegemonic modernist culture has fostered an approval to put it mildly abnormal. Anomaly that is contributing considerably to the pollution of our Church.

Before the Council there was a God-centered vision of life, religion and the world. Since Vatican II, the vision has become anthropocentric. " What you need to man ? ", Instead of " that give worship to God ? "Where there is everything that man needs God in

We're talking about Church 'visible', although not all. Let's say that we speak of the Church who picked up a governing power improperly with the 'pastoral', ie with the practice (unbiased) rather than a doctrine of definition and in continuity with the Tradition. That part of the Church, we must recognize that despite our mutated CAN NOT 'be the church, but a counterfeit.

At this point I have no answers, except entrusts to the Lord and keep Faith, trying to spread as long as I can. In fact, do not take it for granted that the 'mutation' which was the subject of the Church, for the fact that at the moment is winning the majority, which is the part alone. Truth is not in the consensus of more and only choosing according to their conscience, we choose the truth. If we choose the fashion of the time, we would do so at our peril ... And 'why, for me, I gave up long ago, and realistically, to place hope in this' pastoral' apostate who has been the admission that is nothing but a pseudo-apostolic revelation. I can not but take note, but I can never join in consciousness or nor in spirit and in truth ...

Yet at this point I would like to point out the increasing evidence of the two (and maybe more, unfortunately) anime recognizable in the visible Church of our time, which is now difficult to navigate and unravel the tangle of innovations and misinformation passed off as spirit reconcile the dominant culture continues to weave and carry on, trying to delegitimize any voice trying to 'show' the Catholic truth without disguise or modernists, or by so-called 'new Pentecost'.

And I would also like to emphasize that these different souls are in fact allied coining the vulgate of As unlikely as a mysterious "traditionalist Protestantism" itself as "conservative" ... the Council! In fact, conservatives of today are those who want to preserve the so-called spirit of the council doing it - they put in a corner of the dogmas subjecting them to an absurd developments - a new untouchable "superdogma ...

note that the term "conservative" does not fit with Tradition, which 'preserves ' in the sense that ' guards', the "deposit of faith " Apostolic, but at the same time does not store any kind of fixism , which suits her as she is alive in the sense insegnato da mons. Gherardini, della “ continuità evolutiva ”, che esclude tutti quei criteri immanentistici che si sono imposti, dall’Illuminismo ad oggi, sia alla filosofia che alla teologia. Gli Apostoli ci hanno lasciato quanto da Cristo avevano ricevuto ratione ecclesiae , non i carismi personali ma le verità riguardanti la Fede e la Chiesa. So di averlo già detto, ma repetita iuvant .

I Padri la chiamano Traditio Dominica o Traditio Apostolica “lo Spirito Santo vi ricorderà tutte le cose che vi ho insegnato io” (Gv 14, 26). L’ insufflatio dello Spirito [Presente nella Chiesa: where is the Son is the Father and the Holy Spirit] does not cover one or more, but " quaecumque dixero vobis" means all things, acquisitions ever deeper, new and old ( Jn 16:13).